Coastal property concentrates several categories of planning risk that standard conveyancing searches are poorly equipped to handle. Overlapping designations — SSSI, AONB, Heritage Coast, Marine Conservation Zone, Coastal Change Management Area — interact with planning history in ways that are not surfaced by LLC1 or CON29. And the planning authorities that govern coastal properties are often split between the LPA, the Environment Agency, Marine Management Organisation, and in some cases Natural England — each with its own register, each potentially holding relevant information.
A Coastal Change Management Area (CCMA) is a planning designation that identifies areas of coastline likely to be affected by coastal erosion or flooding within a specified period — typically 20–100 years. Within a CCMA, planning policy restricts what development can be approved. Permissions granted within CCMAs may carry specific conditions — time-limited permissions, removal obligations, or restrictions on permitted development rights.
For a buyer, the CCMA designation itself may not affect their immediate use of the property. But it affects the value of any development potential, the ability to extend or improve the property, and the long-term insurability of the land. CCMAs do not always appear prominently in search results, and the planning implications — particularly the conditions attached to existing permissions — require checking the planning register directly.
A standard CON29 search from the LPA covers planning decisions made under the Town and Country Planning Act. It does not cover permissions or consents from other agencies. On coastal properties, the relevant agencies may include the Marine Management Organisation (for development below the mean high water mark), the Environment Agency (for flood risk management structures), Natural England (for SSSI consents), and in some harbour areas, harbour authorities with their own consent regimes.
A developer who built a sea wall, jetty, boat house, or coastal access structure may have needed consent from several of these bodies. A CON29 will tell you whether they got planning permission. It will not tell you whether they got an MMO marine licence, an EA flood risk consent, or an NE SSSI assent. And the breach of any of those consents may be enforceable independently of the planning position.
Many coastal properties fall within LPA areas that have complex portal histories. Welsh coastal councils — particularly Gwynedd, Pembrokeshire, and Conwy — use Civica Portal 360, which blocks automated access at DNS level. The planning history for properties in these areas is inaccessible to standard search tools. We retrieve it using Playwright headless browser tooling.
National Park coastal properties — the Pembrokeshire Coast, parts of the South Downs, Dartmoor where it reaches the coast — fall under National Park Authority planning jurisdiction, not the surrounding LPA. A CON29 from the LPA tells you nothing about planning history recorded under the NPA. Cross-boundary coastal properties may have relevant history in both registers — and only a parallel dual-authority search will surface both.
We retrieve the full planning history and enforcement record for coastal properties — including cross-agency searches, CCMA designations, and withdrawn applications from restricted coastal portals. From £149. Passes as a disbursement.
Commission a pre-exchange report →Download a sample planning intelligence report. Real case, anonymised.
See sample reports →